That Texas Magazine

Friday, November 21, 2008

Life Lessons

A Man of Character

By Howie Doyle

Howie Doyle

When my oldest daughter’s boyfriend, Jonathan, was nearing his graduation from high school, I was asked by his family to write him a letter on becoming a “man of character.”

I knew, by that point, that my eldest daughter, Amber, would probably end up marrying Jonathan Burroughs. They had been together for about three years and seemed perfectly suited to each other. Even at 18 years of age, I could see that he would, undoubtedly, become a man of character, with or without my counseling.

I put a lot of thought into what I should say in the letter. He already had an upbringing that cemented in his core good, old-fashioned virtues (kudos to his parents Mack and Mary Lou), and it bears mentioning that he was a good deal more virtuous at age 18 than I was.

Jonathan has a lively intellect, and he is deeply spiritual. He is an ardent student of history, yet is the life of any party. He also has a profound ability to view life with humor while treating those things most important to him with respect and gravitas.

To Jonathan, I wrote:

Dear Jonathan,

I have been asked to write to you on the subject of becoming a man of character. I have found that as you move through life your definition of “character” changes, so I will offer a moving-picture view of what I think it means.

Does a man of character help old ladies cross the street? Save children from burning buildings? Rescue a stray dog from the side of a highway? Of course – character is most easily identified in such obvious and extreme circumstances. However, since 99.5% of one’s life is consumed in the prosaic acts of day-to-day living, character is much more profoundly (although not as obviously) defined in the little things that fill our days.

While a man’s character can be revealed by his words, 99.5% of character is built on deeds: the actions we take when no one is looking, how they build or destroy us, how they affect our loved ones, how they affect people we don’t even know. In the long run, words count for less than deeds.

While a man’s character can be discerned by his image relative to those around him, 99.5% of character is built on absolute truths and universal principals that are independent of our place in time and our cultural context. In the long run, image counts for less than substance.

Character is planted in us during childhood by our parents, grandparents, and mentors. Character is like knowledge; the more of it we truly have, the more profoundly we realize the areas in which we are lacking.

When I was asked to write to you about becoming a man of character, I put it off for quite a long time. Writing about character would require me to look closely – and objectively – at myself, the good and the bad, and take stock, if this were to be a meaningful letter.

Fortunately, in the writing I perceived one other small insight that I will pass along to you: the willingness to look inside and judge yourself objectively is, in itself, a sign of character. It’s important to not judge yourself too harshly, and even more so not to shun introspection.

And although I have a rather secular way of expressing these thoughts, I can sum it up by saying character is wholly about Godly principals. Good and evil. The Seven Deadly Sins. The Ten Commandments.

Though character is hard to define, I know it when I see it, and I see it strongly in you. Always remember that character is like faith. It is something that we must nurture during our entire lives in order for it to grow. A man can kill his character through neglect. Properly cared for, a man’s character will result in a rich harvest for all of those around him.

That was in the spring of 2001. Fast forward two years, after the World Trade Center was attacked, George Bush was elected, and the Iraq Resolution was passed authorizing war in Iraq. Jonathan came to me to discuss something important. His approach was much the same as it was when he asked for my daughter’s hand in marriage (he still tells tales about the grilling I gave him that day) so I knew this was something fairly major. He told me that he intended to enlist in the U.S. Army, as an infantry man. He wanted to fight for our country, and felt spiritually led to do so.

But Jonathan, I said, with your brains you could easily become an officer, be promoted more quickly, and be a better provider.

Yes, he said, he knew he could probably do that, but he wanted to be on the ground, in the thick of it. He didn’t want the easy way out. He wanted to go where he could best fight for his beliefs, where he could most directly act on what he knew in his gut was right. Besides, he said, if he later became an officer, he would be more respected by his charges, having done anything and everything he would ask them to do. More importantly, he would better respect himself as a leader.

He told me he had prayed for guidance, and that since he was marrying my daughter, felt he should discuss it with me before enlisting.

By the end of our discussion Jonathan had my vote.

It had only been a matter of months since the U.S. Congress voted on the Iraq Resolution, which was passed by affirmative votes from 69 percent of the U.S. House and 77 percent of the U.S. Senate. They passed the Resolution to deal with Iraq's noncompliance with the 1991 cease fire, an alleged program to develop weapons of mass destruction (WMDs), alleged possession of WMDs, willingness to use and sell WMDs, “brutal repression of its civil population,” hostility toward the United States, harboring members of al-Qaeda and other terrorists, U.S. efforts to fight the 9/11 terrorists, the Constitutional authority and Congressional approval for the President to fight anti-U.S. terrorism, and, referencing the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998, reiterating that the U.S. Congress deems that it is the policy of the United States to remove the Hussein regime and help establish a democratic replacement.

It wasn't a decision lightly made. It was out of step with the “world view,” yet overwhelmingly supported by our nation. So when I looked him in the eye and said, “Yes, Jonathan, I think it is good that you go and do this,” I knew as well as Congress and the American public did that it was a big job that may end indecisively, and that while he risked everything, I would be sitting in the easy chair of life, enjoying the bounty of citizenship in the U.S.A.

The conditions that Jonathan lives in are not hellish in the same sense as those of a concentration camp, but if you or I went through them, we would say, “That was hell.” He is in the middle of a country mired in disarray and chaos, while at home his wife struggles to start the lawnmower and feels palpitations every time the phone rings.

The will of his moral compass carries a good soldier like Jonathan in the right direction. He deserves a strong tailwind of support and encouragement, but it amounts to nothing more than a scant breeze that blows this way one minute, the other way the next. Forward he rolls into the theater of life-or-death, on the wheels of childhood lectures about finishing what you start.

Those in the military service of this country are there doing our dirty work. We sent them there. Their work is not done, and it is a messier job than any of us could have imagined, but this is not a situation in which we have the option to go home and take a nap. It was not a Resolution of convenience, and it is not a war of convenience.

When I hear people say we shouldn't be there anymore, I try to see their point of view, but I can't. All I see is a divided nation that will slide back into the hands of oppression, hatred, and evil. We're committed, and we have no other option. Appease the devil and you become the devil. Run from evil and you give it more ground. I love Jonathan like a son, and I told him, face to face, that he should go.

So what now, if I said to him, “You are not getting the job done fast enough. You’re coming out of there next Tuesday, finished or not! It’s a hopeless situation anyway. We have too many problems here at home to be squandering our tax money over there. Maybe this wasn’t such a great idea,”

What if I said that to him, face-to-face? Can you imagine the shame, the embarrassment, the utter humiliation and lack of respect I would have for myself? Maybe you can, maybe you can’t. The pollsters report that at the end of March, only 36 percent opposed legislation to withdraw by March, 2008.

Jonathan, I’m here to call them out, specifically the ones who voted to put you in the line of fire yesterday and question our motives for it today. They will say, “Support our troops,” out of one side of their mouth, and out of the other they will bash our President, our military, and anyone who dares think we should stay and continue to fight.

It is horrible that you are there. I wish you were stateside, with my daughter, in the comfort of your home. Your sacrifice is beyond my life experience. But you are there to stare down the face of evil so I can drink my morning coffee and drive to work in my sports car, and so I can worship my own God, and so that I can express my opinions in this magazine for all to see.

You are fighting for the specific reasons enumerated in the Iraq Resolution, as unmitigated today as on the day it was voted into law by the U.S. Congress. You are there so we don't have to fight them here.

So just remember this: there is nothing more I can tell you about becoming a man of character. You have gone so far past me in character that I can barely see your dust. In you, and those like you, I see hope. For you, and those like you, I have respect. And loyalty. And I will not turn on you tomorrow. My words will support you, from both sides of my mouth.

 

© Copyright 2006 - 2008 Sudden Companies. All Rights Reserved.